In Re: Waiver of Interest of Criminal Debt & Waiver of Collection of Court Appointed Counsel Fees
| In Re: Waiver of Interest of Criminal Debt and Waiver of Collection of Court Appointed Counsel Fees |
| 3:2016mc00161 |
| August 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| Other |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER In The Matter of Waiver of Interest on Criminal Debt and Waiver of Collection of Court Appointed Counsel Fees. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney, Hon. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Hon. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., Hon. Richard L. Voorhees, Hon. Martin Reidinger, and Hon. Graham C. Mullen.(thh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In Re: Waiver of Interest of Criminal Debt & Waiver of Collection of Court Appointed Counsel Fees | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: In Re: Waiver of Interest of Criminal Debt and Waiver of Collection of Court Appointed Counsel Fees | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
