The Cato Corporation v. Stitch Fix, Inc.
| The Cato Corporation |
| Stitch Fix, Inc. |
| 3:2017cv00036 |
| January 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Alexander |
| Graham Mullen |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1121 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 3/27/2017. (eef)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 11 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Jered Evan Matthysse for Stitch Fix, Inc.. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 3/23/2017. (eef)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Cato Corporation v. Stitch Fix, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Cato Corporation | |
| Represented By: | J. Mark Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Stitch Fix, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
