Ash v. Charlotte School of Law, LLC et al
| Leah Ash |
| Charlotte School of Law, LLC, Infilaw Corporation and InfiLaw Holding, LLC |
| 3:2017cv00039 |
| January 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| Graham Mullen |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER dismissing 23 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/11/2017. (brl)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 22 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Robert Cahill admitted pro hac vice to represent to Charlotte School of Law, LLC and InfiLaw Corporation. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/7/17. (mga) (Main Document 24 replaced on 12/7/2017) (mga). NEF regenerated on 12/7/2017 (mga).
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Denying 8 Motion to Remand. Defendant Infilaw Holding, LLC is Dismissed from this case. This case shall be consolidated with the other related cases above for purposes of discovery. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 11/14/2017. (jaw)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER holding in Abeyance 8 Motion to Remand pending the Courts resolution of InfiLaw Holding, LLCs Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction in a related case. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 6/22/2017. (eef)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER granting 9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added David Mills for Charlotte School of Law, LLC,InfiLaw Holding, LLC, and Infilaw Corporation. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 3/3/2017. (eef)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
