Verigent, LLC v. Schiano
| 3:2017cv00187 |
| April 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| Contract: Other |
| Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
CONSENT ORDER granting 32 Motion for Entry of Consent Order. The parties agree that the entry of this Consent Order concludes this legal action and that the terms of this Consent Order and settlement are fair and reasonab le. Consistent with the terms of this Consent Order and the Settlement Agreement, this action, and all claims alleged by Verigent, are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS. The Clerk is respectfully directed to CLOSE THE CASE. The parties agree that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over any dispute involving this Consent Order or the Settlement Agreement.. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 2/27/18. (clc)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER denying without prejudice 12 Motion to Dismiss ; denying 14 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/17/17. (mga)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER granting 7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Michael Eric Ross added for Michael Schiano. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 5/17/17. (mga)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Verigent, LLC v. Schiano | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
