Matthews v. Hyatt Corporation
Plaintiff: Carla Matthews
Defendant: Hyatt Corporation
Case Number: 3:2017cv00413
Filed: July 14, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Buncombe
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Conrad
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 69 Final ORDER Approving Class Action Settlement, Entry of Judgment, and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 2/26/2019. (brl)
January 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER granting 64 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Rod M. Johnston is hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent Plaintiffs Carla Matthews and all similarly situated individuals. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 1/22/19. (mga)
July 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER affirming 33 Memorandum and Recommendations.; denying as moot 24 MOTION to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 7/11/2018. (eef)
May 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER granting 54 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint and to Stay all Proceedings Pending Outcome of Voluntary Mediation. Plaintiffs shall file their Second Amended Complaint on or before May 21, 20 18. The parties shall file a Status Report or Notice Of Settlement, following their mediation, but no later than July 26, 2018. If this matter is not settled, Defendant shall file an Answer, or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint, on or before August 3, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion To Dismiss Count II Of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (Document No. 35 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 5/17/18. (mga)
January 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER granting 13 Motion to Certify Class Plaintiff's Pre-Discovery Motion for Conditional Class Certification and Court - Approved Notice to Potential Opt-In Plaintiffs Pursuant to 29 U.S. C. Section 216(b). Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 1/5/2018. (eef)
September 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER granting 23 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Ms. Kara L. Goodwin is hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent for Hyatt Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 9/18/17. (mga)
August 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting 6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Charles R. Ash, IV added for Carla Matthews. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 8/3/17. (mga)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matthews v. Hyatt Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carla Matthews
Represented By: Charles Robert Ash, IV
Represented By: Edward B. Davis
Represented By: Jesse L. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hyatt Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?