Abadi v. Mecklenburg County Health Department et al
Plaintiff: Nazanin Rostastam Abadi
Defendant: Mecklenburg County Health Department and Mecklenberg County Government
Case Number: 3:2017cv00435
Filed: July 24, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Presiding Judge: Frank D. Whitney
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 63 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 6/20/2019. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl)
February 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 Plaintiff's Motion for getting continuation/Extension for Discovery Completion. The parties shall complete these depositions by March 15, 2019. To the extent Plaintiff' s motion seeks other relief, it is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Denying as moot 39 Plaintiff's Motion to Request Court to Order Defendant to Comply with Production of Documents ; granting 40 Defendant's Motion for Protective Order; grant ing 46 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment ( Responses due by 3/22/2019 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail). Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 2/13/19. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 37 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/06/2018. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)
May 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER granting 30 Motion/Request To Postpone The Case. The parties shall have up to and including September 14, 2018 to file their Certificate of Initial Attorney's Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 5/30/18. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
November 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiffs hostile work environment claim under Title VII and Plaintiffs REDA claim. Furthermore, the Court determines th at Mecklenburg County Health Department lacks the capacity to be sued and is DISMISSED from this case. Plaintiffs remaining claim for retaliation pursuant to Title VII survives Defendants motion to dismiss.. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/27/17. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abadi v. Mecklenburg County Health Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nazanin Rostastam Abadi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mecklenburg County Health Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mecklenberg County Government
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?