Albright v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education et al
Inez Annette Albright |
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, Eric Ward, Chaunel Johnson and Avery Mitchell |
3:2017cv00461 |
August 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
David S. Cayer |
Frank D. Whitney |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER Consistent with the Report of the Mediator and the Case Management Order, the Court hereby gives notice to the parties that if they did not file an agreement for entry of judgment or stipulation of dismissal on or before April 26, 2018, the Court will dismiss the case without prejudice, ( Stipulation of dismissal due by 4/26/2018.). Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 3/29/18. (clc) |
Filing 31 CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 3/21/18. (mga) |
Filing 23 ORDER denying without prejudice 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 12/5/17. (clc) |
Filing 15 ORDER denying 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and the Request for Preliminary Hearing (Doc. No. 11) as moo. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/19/17. (clc) |
Filing 9 ORDER denying as moot without prejudice 4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 7 Motion to Amend Complaint. Plaintiff shall file her Second Amended Complaint within seven(7) days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 9/26/17. (tob) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.