Rand v. USA
| Michael T. Rand |
| USA |
| 3:2017cv00687 |
| November 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Mecklenburg |
| Robert J. Conrad |
| Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER granting 45 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages; denying 46 Pro Se MOTION for Reconsideration/Rule 60 (B) re 35 Order on Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255), 36 Clerk's Judgment; denying as moot 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 and Section 2255 Cases, this Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Senior District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 7/7/2023. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ef)
|
|
Filing
36
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 03/06/2020. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ctb)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER that Petitioner's Declaration (Doc. No. 10-1) and Notice of Errata (Doc. No. 12) are STRICKEN. Petitioner may file an Amended Declaration within 14 days of this Order. Amended Declaration due by 10/22/2019. The Government is granted leave to file a Response to Petitioner's Amended Declaration within 14 days after the Amended Declaration is filed. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 10/8/2019. (brl)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER that Petitioners counsel shall file a Response within five (5) days of this Order stating whether he is adopting Petitioners 23 MOTION for Extension of Time. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 11/14/2018. (ams)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Adam Hames for Michael T. Rand; granting 16 Motion for Extension of Time to respond to the § 2255 petition ( Responses due by 10/15/2018 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail). Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 8/7/2018. (ams)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Granting 11 MOTION for Leave to File. Counsel for Petitioner may file a memorandum in support of the First Amended § 2255 Motion to Vacate within 14 days of this Order. The United States Attorney shall file an answer or other responsive pleading to Petitioners First Amended § 2255 Motion to Vacate due by 7/30/2018. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 5/16/2018. (jaw)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added David Schoen for Michael T. Rand. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 1/5/2018. (chh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rand v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael T. Rand | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Baptiste Holloway |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
