USA v. In Re: All Assests Related to Walter Clifton Martin, WMJ Enterprises and Michael Faulkenberry at First Bank
Petitioner: USA
Respondent: In Re: All Assests Related to Walter Clifton Martin, WMJ Enterprises and Michael Faulkenberry at First Bank
Case Number: 3:2017mc00136
Filed: September 28, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Presiding Judge: Graham Mullen
Nature of Suit: Other
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. In Re: All Assests Related to Walter Clifton Martin, WMJ Enterprises and Michael Faulkenberry at First Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: USA
Represented By: Benjamin Bain-Creed(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Represented By: Tiffany Mallory Moore(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: In Re: All Assests Related to Walter Clifton Martin, WMJ Enterprises and Michael Faulkenberry at First Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?