Mobile Tech., Inc. v. Invue Security Products Inc.
Plaintiff: Mobile Tech, Inc.
Defendant: InVue Security Products Inc.
Counter_claimant: InVue Security Products Inc.
Counter_defendant: Mobile Tech, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2018cv00052
Filed: January 30, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
County: XX, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Conrad
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 106 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 3/12/2020. (mek)
March 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER granting 99 Motion to Stay. This matter shall be stayed as to all proceedings pending the USPTO's reexamination of the '140 Patent and the '281 Patent. Status Reports due no less then once every (90) days. Signed by District Judge Kenneth D. Bell on 3/5/2020. (tmg)
December 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER The 83 Amended Motion to Stay Pending Ex Parte Reexamination of All Patents-In-Suit is DENIED without prejudice to being re-filed if the USPTO issues an initial office action in its favor; the 82 Motion to Stay Pending Ex Parte Reexamination of All Patents-In-Suit and 91 Motion for Leave to File Notice of Subsequently Discovered Facts are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 12/6/2019. (mek)
October 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER granting 89 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Jason Alan Pittman for InVue Security Products Inc. and InVue Security Products Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 10/24/2019. (mek)
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER adopting 79 Memorandum and Recommendations and denying Defendant's partial 72 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by District Judge Kenneth D. Bell on 7/9/2019. (nvc)
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER granting (60) Motion to Consolidate Cases for DiscoveryTrial. All further pleadings to be electronically filed to: 3:18cv52 only. Member Case: 3:18cv505 to be administratively closed in case 3:18-cv-00052-RJC-DSC. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 10/2/2018. (eef)
August 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER denying 52 Motion to Dismiss Defendants First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Counterclaims and to Strike Defendants Fourth and Fifth Defenses ; affirming 56 Memorandum and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 08/15/2018. (brl)
February 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER granting 47 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Robyn H. Ast-Gmoser for Mobile Tech, Inc.; granting 48 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Matthew A. Braunel for Mobile Tech, Inc.; granting 49 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added David B. Jinkins for Mobile Tech, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 2/6/18. (tob)
February 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER granting 43 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 2/5/18. (tob)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mobile Tech., Inc. v. Invue Security Products Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mobile Tech, Inc.
Represented By: Brian G Arnold
Represented By: Robyn H. Ast-Gmoser
Represented By: Matthew A. Braunel
Represented By: Eric H. Cottrell
Represented By: Steven E Garlock
Represented By: Robert D Gerlach
Represented By: David Bergstrand Jinkins
Represented By: Alan H. Norman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: InVue Security Products Inc.
Represented By: Nicholas J Hoffman
Represented By: Tim F. Williams
Represented By: J. Mark Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: InVue Security Products Inc.
Represented By: Nicholas J Hoffman
Represented By: Tim F. Williams
Represented By: J. Mark Wilson
Represented By: Nicholas J Hoffman
Represented By: Tim F. Williams
Represented By: J. Mark Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Mobile Tech, Inc.
Represented By: Brian G Arnold
Represented By: Robyn H. Ast-Gmoser
Represented By: Matthew A. Braunel
Represented By: Eric H. Cottrell
Represented By: Steven E Garlock
Represented By: Robert D Gerlach
Represented By: David Bergstrand Jinkins
Represented By: Alan H. Norman
Represented By: Brian G Arnold
Represented By: Robyn H. Ast-Gmoser
Represented By: Matthew A. Braunel
Represented By: Eric H. Cottrell
Represented By: Steven E Garlock
Represented By: Robert D Gerlach
Represented By: David Bergstrand Jinkins
Represented By: Alan H. Norman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?