Woodward v. Clonniger et al
| Robert E. Woodward |
| Alan Clonniger, Kim LNU, Jane Doe and FNU Nolen |
| 3:2018cv00220 |
| April 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Alexander |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| Civil Rights |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 41 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 2/10/2020. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 38 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/18/2019. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER that Defendants shall have seven (7) days from this Order in which to file the video footage in support of their summary judgment motion, ( Video footage on a flash drive (not on a CD) due by 8/29/2019.). Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 8/22/19. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER that the Clerk shall send Plaintiff summons forms to fill out so that service may be made on Defendants Sheriff Cloninger, Kim LNU, and FNU Nolen. Once the Court receives the summons forms, the U.S. Marshal shall effectu ate service on Defendants Sheriff Cloninger, Kim LNU, and FNU Nolen in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As to Defendant Jane Doe, the parties shall proceed in accordance with this Order.. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 8/24/18. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
