Coffey v. North Carolina Prisoners Legal Services et al
| Michael Ray Coffey |
| Commissioner, North Carolina Prisoners Legal Services, Mary Pollard and North Carolina Department of Public Safety |
| 3:2018cv00351 |
| July 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| XX, Outside District |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Georgia Middle; Case Number 5:18-cv-00147. Original electronic file and docket sheet received. |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (tmg) |
| Pro Se Law Clerk Referral to PSLC: 4 (tmg) |
| Case Electronically Transferred Out - District Transfer to Western District of North Carolina. All documents, including a certified copy of the docket sheet and pleading were transferred electronically. **The Notice of Electronic Filing serves as certification for these transferred documents.**(Case Transfer Acknowledgment deadline 7/13/2018.) (ans) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/2/2018.] |
Filing 6
ORDER OF TRANSFER transferring proceedings to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 6/28/2018. (tlh) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/2/2018.]
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED #1 Complaint, against NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, NORTH CAROLINA PRISONERS LEGAL SERVICES by MICHAEL RAY COFFEY (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Indictment and Judgment filed in Cherokee Superior Court, #2 Exhibit B - Letter dated 08/13/10 from Roxane Cipra to Michael R. Cofey, #3 Exhibit C - exhibits attached to initial complaint are meant to be Exhibit C per cover letter, #4 Exhibit D - Information from the North Carolina Department of Corrections, #5 Exhibit E - Letters, #6 Exhibit F - Superior Court of Cherokee County Order, #7 Exhibit G - Letter dated 12/29/09 from Kisa J. Krishen to Randall Sanders, #8 Exhibit H - Letter dated 08/11/10 from Gail Engilsh to Plaintiff, #9 Exhibit I - Letter dated 08/10/10 to Ms. Baker, Assistant Deputy Clerk, #10 Cover Letter, #11 Envelope)(ans) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/2/2018.] |
| Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to MICHAEL RAY COFFEY. (vs) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/2/2018.] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (vs) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/2/2018.]
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by MICHAEL RAY COFFEY. Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(vs) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/2/2018.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, NORTH CAROLINA PRISONERS LEGAL SERVICES, MARY S POLLARD,filed by MICHAEL RAY COFFEY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Final Disposition from the Superior Court of Cherokee County, #2 Exhibit B - Letters to Mr. Coffey, #3 Exhibit C - List of Institutions that Plaintiff have been confined, #4 Cover Letter, #5 Envelope)(vs) - This document is located on the shelf in the Clerk's Office as some pages are cut off at the bottom as reflected on the original document - Modified on 4/30/2018 to add explanation re document being on shelf (ans). [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/2/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
