Arch Insurance Company v. Adolfson & Peterson, Inc. et al
| Arch Insurance Company |
| Adolfson & Peterson, Inc. and AP Atlantic, Inc. |
| 3:2018cv00402 |
| July 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| XX, Outside State |
| David S Cayer |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (brl) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-3755870), filed by Arch Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint in Case No. 16-CVS-14844, #2 Exhibit B - Arch 2014-2015 Policy, #3 Exhibit C - Arch 2015-2016 Policy, #4 Summons to Adolfson & Peterson, Inc., #5 Summons to AP Atlantic, Inc.)(Scott, Shawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
