United States of America v. Approximately $16,037 in funds
| United States of America |
| Approximately $16,037 in funds |
| 3:2018cv00415 |
| July 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Union |
| Robert J Conrad |
| David Keesler |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| Complaint for Forfeiture |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Abandon claim to funds by Approximately $16,037 in funds (Williams, Lance) |
| NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 you are required to conduct an Initial Attorney's Conference within 14 days. At the conference, the parties are required to discuss the issue of consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rules 16.1(A) and 73.1(C). The #Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference, and if applicable, the #Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, should be filed within 7 days of the conference. If appropriate, a party may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference. CIAC Report due by 10/10/2018. (ams) |
| Filing 7 Verified claim ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Approximately $16,037 in funds.(Williams, Lance) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Defendant shall have up to and including September 18, 2018 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 9/7/18. (mga)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Approximately $16,037 in funds. Responses due by 9/20/2018 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail (Williams, Lance). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 4 SERVICE by Publication filed by United States of America. Last publication date 08/30/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Moore, Tiffany) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Service (Direct Notice) by United States of America re #2 Warrant Issued for Arrest of Property, #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Moore, Tiffany) |
| Filing 2 WARRANT Issued for Arrest of Property (brl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM against Approximately $16,037 in funds, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Moore, Tiffany) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately $16,037 in funds | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Approximately $16,037 in funds | |
| Represented By: | Lance Christian Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Tiffany Mallory Moore |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
