Tuttle v. Harris Teeter, LLC et al
Jeffrey W. Tuttle |
Harris Teeter, LLC, Harris Teeter Long Term Disability Plan, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. and Aetna Life Insurance Company |
3:2018cv00449 |
August 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Mecklenburg |
David Keesler |
Graham Mullen |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. § 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 you are required to conduct an Initial Attorney's Conference within 14 days. At the conference, the parties are required to discuss the issue of consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rules 16.1(A) and 73.1(C). The #Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference, and if applicable, the #Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, should be filed within 7 days of the conference. If appropriate, a party may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference. CIAC Report due by 10/30/2018. (ams) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint by Aetna Life Insurance Company, Harris Teeter Long Term Disability Plan, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., Harris Teeter, LLC.(Bondurant, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 8 Summons Issued Electronically as to Aetna Life Insurance Company. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (ams) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jeffrey W. Tuttle.(Bumgardner, Thomas) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss ( Responses due by 9/26/2018 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail), MOTION to Substitute Party ( Responses due by 9/26/2018 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail), MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by Harris Teeter Long Term Disability Plan, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., Harris Teeter, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Brief in Support, #2 Exhibit 1 - Policy, #3 Exhibit 2 - Schedule of Benefits, #4 Exhibit 3 - Complaint and Appeals Disability Rider, #5 Exhibit 4 - Booklet-Certificate)(Bondurant, Elizabeth). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
|
Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Notice of Removal, by Harris Teeter Long Term Disability Plan, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., Harris Teeter, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (Consent Order))(Bondurant, Elizabeth). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Harris Teeter Long Term Disability Plan, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., Harris Teeter, LLC (Bondurant, Elizabeth) |
Case assigned to Senior Judge Graham Mullen and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(ams) |
Filing 2 Miscellaneous Filing by Harris Teeter Long Term Disability Plan, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., Harris Teeter, LLC. re: #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet (Bondurant, Elizabeth) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of Mecklenburg County, case number 18-CVS-13467. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-3779105), filed by Harris Teeter Long Term Disability Plan, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., Harris Teeter, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint and Summons (Mecklenburg Superior), #2 Exhibit 2 - Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 3 - Notice of Filing NOR (Mecklenburg Superior))(Bondurant, Elizabeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.