Inman v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
Deon Inman |
Paul Ford, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and Raymond Strawn, Jr. |
3:2018cv00606 |
November 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Max O Cogburn |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 ra |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage answer due 1/14/2019. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 01/02/2019. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Frederick) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Paul Ford, Raymond Strawn, Jr, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. (Attachments: #1 USM285- Wells Fargo, #2 USM285 -Ford, #3 USM285 - Strawn)(brl) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 11/14/2018. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl) |
Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Deon Inman. (brl) |
Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against Paul Ford, Raymond Strawn, Jr, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, filed by Deon Inman. (Attachments: #1 EEOC - Charge of Discrimination, #2 Summons)(brl) |
Clerk's Entry and Service of #Case Assignment Packet. The document was served conventionally by US Mail (brl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.