United States of America v. Approx. $2,209 in United States Currency et al
| United States of America |
| Approx. $2,209 in United States Currency and Approx. $50,000 in funds |
| Thuy Tien Luong |
| 3:2018cv00635 |
| November 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Max O Cogburn |
| David Keesler |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Thuy Tien Luong.(Sherrill, Wilbert) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of SERVICE (Direct Notice) by United States of America re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Bain-Creed, Benjamin) |
| Filing 4 CLAIM Ownership-Seized Property by Thuy Tien Luong. (Sherrill, Wilbert) |
| Filing 3 Department of the Treasury Process Receipt and Return re #2 Warrant Issued for Arrest of Property, filed by United States of America. (Bain-Creed, Benjamin) |
| Filing 2 WARRANT Issued for Arrest of Property. (ams) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM against Approximately $2,209 in United States Currency et al, filed by United States of America.(Bain-Creed, Benjamin) Modified text on 11/29/2018 (ams). |
| Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(ams) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
