Gean v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education et al
Thomasina Gean |
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Huntingtowne Farms Elementary Schools, Classroom Teachers Association and Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education |
3:2018cv00637 |
November 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Robert J Conrad |
David Keesler |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 NOTICE of intent not to file reply by Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education, Huntingtowne Farms Elementary Schools re #17 Response in Opposition to Motion, by Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education, Huntingtowne Farms Elementary Schools. (Wallace, Terry) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of intent not to file reply by Classroom Teachers Association re #17 Response in Opposition to Motion, #16 Response in Opposition to Motion, #15 Reply to Response to Motion by Classroom Teachers Association. (Ledford, Joseph) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of intent not to file reply by Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education, Huntingtowne Farms Elementary Schools re #16 Response in Opposition to Motion, by Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education, Huntingtowne Farms Elementary Schools. (Wallace, Terry) |
Filing 17 Pro Se RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION to Dismiss , #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Thomasina Gean. Replies due by 1/18/2019 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jaw) |
Filing 16 Pro Se RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION to Dismiss , #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Thomasina Gean. Replies due by 1/15/2019 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail (jaw) |
Filing 15 Pro Se REPLY in Opposition to Response to Memorandum in Opposition re #2 MOTION to Dismiss by Thomasina Gean. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jaw) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #2 MOTION to Dismiss and specifically Plaintiff's Motion to Remand ECF 10 by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Replies due by 1/2/2019 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail (Beck, Gill) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of intent not to file reply by Classroom Teachers Association re #8 Response in Opposition, by Classroom Teachers Association. (Ledford, Joseph) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of intent not to file reply by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission re #7 Response in Opposition, to Motion to Dismiss filed by by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Beck, Gill) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing of Motion for Consolidation of Cases re: Case Nos. 3:18cv437 (Wallace, Terry) |
Filing 10 Pro Se RESPONSE in Opposition re #1 Notice of Removal by Thomasina Gean. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jaw) |
Filing 9 Pro Se RESPONSE in Opposition to any Attorney known or unknown in this case Motion to Dismiss by Thomasina Gean. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jaw) |
Filing 8 Pro Se RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , #5 Memorandum in Support of Motion by Thomasina Gean. Replies due by 12/26/2018 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Attachment)(jaw) Modified reply deadline on 12/19/2018 (jaw). |
Filing 7 Pro Se RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION to Dismiss , #3 Memorandum in Support of Motion by Thomasina Gean. Replies due by 12/26/2018 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jaw) Modified reply deadline on 12/19/2018 (jaw). |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Response in Opposition Doc#7 and Doc#8 Replies due by 12/26/2018. (jaw) |
Filing 6 ROSEBORO ORDER Setting Response Deadline re: #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , #2 MOTION to Dismiss . Responses due by 1/8/2019 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail. The parties shall file a Status Report, or in the alternative a Motion to Consolidate, that addresses whether this case should be consolidated with Gean v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education, 3:18-cv-457-RJC-DCK on or before January 1, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/18/18. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Specific Document due by 1/1/2019. (mga) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Classroom Teachers Association. (Ledford, Joseph) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Classroom Teachers Association. Responses due by 12/20/2018 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail (Ledford, Joseph). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM in Support re #2 MOTION to Dismiss by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Beck, Gill) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Responses due by 12/17/2018 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail (Beck, Gill). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(ams) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Mecklenburg County Superior Court, case number 18cvs15296., filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Beck, Gill) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.