Galeas-Menchu v. Gevara et al
Jorge Galeas-Menchu, Jr |
FNU Williams, FNU Brown, NCDAC, Randy Mullis, Timothy S. Raynolds, Jerline Bennett, NCDPS, Anson County Sheriff Department, Lanesboro Correctional Institution, Aaron Allen David, City of Wadesboro, Anson County, Keven J. Ingram, John Herring, C. Zimmerman, FNU Hatley, John and Jane Doe, Kevin White, Jorge Gevara and North Carolina Department of Corrections |
3:2018cv00659 |
December 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Frank D Whitney |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Mail - 1/28/2019 Documents sent returned as undeliverable, Inamate is refusing Legal Mail. (jaw) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Default Affidavit of Notice by Jorge Galeas-Menchu, Jr (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope)(jaw) |
Filing 6 Mail (Notice of Deficiency) returned as undeliverable. (jaw) Modified text on 2/1/2019 (brl). |
Filing 5 Letter from Jorge Galeas-Menchu, Jr (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jaw) |
Filing 4 Pro Se Letter from Jorge Gevara (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jaw) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint. The filing fee of $400.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Application or Fee due by 1/2/2019. (ams) |
Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jorge Galeas-Menchu, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Summons, #3 Envelope)(ams) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.