Velasquez v. Ormond
| Juan A. Velasquez |
| Matthew Delano Ormond |
| 3:2019cv00178 |
| April 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 PRO SE MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Juan A. Velasquez. (mga) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Matthew Delano Ormond, filed by Juan A. Velasquez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mga) Modified text on 4/9/2019 (mga). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Velasquez v. Ormond | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Juan A. Velasquez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Matthew Delano Ormond | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
