Edwin v. Jiasheng, Inc
Plaintiff: Kelly Edwin
Defendant: Jiasheng, Inc. d/b/a Jia Asian Fusion and Sushi Bar and Jiasheng, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv00306
Filed: July 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David S Cayer
Referring Judge: Max O Cogburn
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2019 Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Jiasheng, Inc..(Liska, Gerald)
August 20, 2019 NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 you are required to conduct an Initial Attorney's Conference within 14 days. At the conference, the parties are required to discuss the issue of consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rules 16.1(A) and 73.1(C). The #Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference, and if applicable, the #Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, should be filed within 7 days of the conference. If appropriate, a party may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference. CIAC Report due by 9/10/2019. (brj)
July 22, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Jiasheng, Inc.. (Liska, Gerald). Motions referred to David S. Cayer.
July 22, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Gerald L. Liska on behalf of Jiasheng, Inc. (Liska, Gerald)
July 22, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Jiasheng, Inc.'s answer due 8/20/2019. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 07/22/2019. (DLG)
July 2, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Jiasheng, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (brj)
July 2, 2019 Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brj)
July 1, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jiasheng, Inc. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4081028), filed by Kelly Edwin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh. 1 - Consent Form)(Chestnut, Jason)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edwin v. Jiasheng, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jiasheng, Inc. d/b/a Jia Asian Fusion and Sushi Bar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jiasheng, Inc.
Represented By: Gerald L. Liska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly Edwin
Represented By: Jason S. Chestnut
Represented By: Philip J. Gibbons, Jr
Represented By: Craig Lorne Leis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?