McFarlane v. Bradley Personnel, Inc.
| Karen McFarlane |
| Bradley Personnel, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv00418 |
| August 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Graham Mullen |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan: Estimated Trial Time: Two (2) to Three (3) Days. Discovery due by 5/27/2020. Motions due by 6/26/2020. Mediation deadline set for 3/20/2020. Jury Trial set for 11/16/2020 10:00 AM in Courtroom, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Senior Judge Graham Mullen.. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 10/04/2019. (ctb)
|
| Filing 6 Joint CERTIFICATION of initial attorney conference and discovery plan (Chestnut, Jason) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bradley Personnel, Inc. (Jenkins, Amy) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Bradley Personnel, Inc.(Jenkins, Amy) Modified text on 9/25/2019 (rth). |
| NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 you are required to conduct an Initial Attorney's Conference within 14 days. At the conference, the parties are required to discuss the issue of consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rules 16.1(A) and 73.1(C). The #Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference, and if applicable, the #Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, should be filed within 7 days of the conference. If appropriate, a party may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference. CIAC Report due by 10/16/2019. (rth) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Karen McFarlane. Bradley Personnel, Inc. served on 9/9/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Acceptance of Service Email, #2 Exhibit Proof of Service)(Chestnut, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Bradley Personnel, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (brj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bradley Personnel, Inc. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4151415), filed by Karen McFarlane.(Chestnut, Jason) |
| Case assigned to Senior Judge Graham Mullen. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McFarlane v. Bradley Personnel, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bradley Personnel, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Amy Yager Jenkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Karen McFarlane | |
| Represented By: | Jason S. Chestnut |
| Represented By: | Philip J. Gibbons, Jr |
| Represented By: | Craig Lorne Leis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
