Gafcon, Inc. v. AECOM Caribe, LLP
Plaintiff: Gafcon, Inc.
Defendant: Aecom Caribe, LLP
Case Number: 3:2019cv00445
Filed: September 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Referring Judge: Frank D Whitney
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2019 Filing 7 Miscellaneous Filing by Aecom Caribe, LLP. Letter, Documents and Certificate of Service for service upon Plaintiff's Counsel for Case Assignment Packet, Initial Scheduling Order and Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Form (Edwards, Theodore)
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting with modification #5 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Notice of Removal/Complaint. Defendant Aecom Caribe, LLP shall have up to and including October 8, 2019 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 9/11/19. (mga) Modified text on 9/11/2019 (mga).
September 11, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Notice of Removal, Plaintiff's Complaint by Aecom Caribe, LLP. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order for Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint)(Edwards, Theodore). Motions referred to David Keesler.
September 11, 2019 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Aecom Caribe, LLP (Attachments: #1 Appendix List of Corporate Parents for AECOM Caribe, LLP)(Rigsby, Jesse)
September 11, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jesse Huntsman Rigsby, IV on behalf of Aecom Caribe, LLP (Rigsby, Jesse)
September 11, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Theodore Curtis Edwards, II on behalf of Aecom Caribe, LLP (Edwards, Theodore)
September 11, 2019 Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (brj)
September 11, 2019 Case assigned to Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brj)
September 11, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Mecklenburg County Superior Court, case number 19-CVS-16234. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4172300), filed by Aecom Caribe, LLP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Complaint and Exhibits, #2 Exhibit B - Notice to State Court of Removal to Federal Court, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of Removal to Adverse Party)(Edwards, Theodore)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gafcon, Inc. v. AECOM Caribe, LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aecom Caribe, LLP
Represented By: Theodore Curtis Edwards, II
Represented By: Jesse Huntsman Rigsby, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gafcon, Inc.
Represented By: John Thomas Floyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?