Olarte-Helbing v. Principle Long Term Care, Inc.
Marissa Olarte-Helbing |
PRINCIPLE LONG TERM CARE, INC.d/b/a LAKE PARK NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER and Principle Long Term Care, Inc. |
3:2020cv00079 |
February 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Robert J Conrad |
David Keesler |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by Principle Long Term Care, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hughes, Kelly). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Marissa Olarte-Helbing. Principle Long Term Care, Inc. waiver sent on 2/7/2020, answer due 4/7/2020. (Martoccio, Gary) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Principle Long Term Care, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (ctb) |
Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(ctb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Principle Long Term Care, Inc. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4375882), filed by Marissa Olarte-Helbing. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(Martoccio, Gary) Modified to correct capitalization of Defendant's name on 2/7/2020 (ctb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.