Oppenheimer v. A.C. Schultes of Carolina, Inc. et al
| David Gordon Oppenheimer |
| Does 1-10 and A.C. Schultes of Carolina, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv00297 |
| May 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| David Keesler |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of a copyright action regarding copyright numbers VAu 1-142-190. (Attachments: #1 Copy of Complaint) (brj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against A.C. Schultes of Carolina, Inc., Does 1-10 with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4508341), filed by David Gordon Oppenheimer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Copyrighted Photo, #2 Exhibit B-Copyright Registration, #3 Exhibit C-Infringing Photograph)(Jernigan, Justin) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brj) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (brj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
