Cheek v. Gurstel Law Firm, P.C et al
| LeGretta F. Cheek |
| Brennan S. Murray, Jesse H. Walker and Gurstel Law Firm, P.C |
| 3:2020cv00302 |
| May 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| David S Cayer |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Gurstel Law Firm, P.C, Brennan S. Murray, Jesse H. Walker. (Enloe, Caren) |
| Filing 15 DECLARATION of Jesse H. Walker re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Gurstel Law Firm, P.C, Brennan S. Murray, Jesse H. Walker (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Enloe, Caren) |
| Filing 14 DECLARATION of Todd L. Gurstel re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Gurstel Law Firm, P.C, Brennan S. Murray, Jesse H. Walker (Enloe, Caren) |
| Filing 13 DECLARATION of Brennan S. Murray re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Gurstel Law Firm, P.C, Brennan S. Murray, Jesse H. Walker (Enloe, Caren) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Gurstel Law Firm, P.C, Brennan S. Murray, Jesse H. Walker. Responses due by 8/3/2020 (Enloe, Caren) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed Jesse H. Walker served on 6/9/2020. (Attachment: #1 Envelope)(mek) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Gurstel Law Firm, P.C answer due 7/20/2020; Brennan S. Murray answer due 7/20/2020; Jesse H. Walker answer due 7/20/2020.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 6/25/2020. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)
|
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Gurstel Law Firm, P.C, Brennan S. Murray, Jesse H. Walker (Enloe, Caren) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Gurstel Law Firm, P.C, Brennan S. Murray, Jesse H. Walker. (Enloe, Caren). Motions referred to David S. Cayer. |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Caren D. Enloe on behalf of Gurstel Law Firm, P.C, Brennan S. Murray, Jesse H. Walker (Enloe, Caren) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by LeGretta F. Cheek. Todd L. Gurstel served on 6/09/20. (brj) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by LeGretta F. Cheek. Gurstel Law Firm, P.C served on 6/9/2020. (brj) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by LeGretta F. Cheek. Brennan S. Murray served on 6/9/2020, answer due 6/30/2020. (brj) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Gurstel Law Firm, P.C answer due 6/29/2020. (brj) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by LeGretta F. Cheek. Gurstel Law Firm, P.C served on 6/8/2020, answer due 6/29/2020. (mga) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Conventionally as to All Defendants. (brj) |
| Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number CHD060008), filed by LeGretta F. Cheek. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(brj) |
| Entry deleted- Duplicate entry |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (brj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
