Jones v. McFadden et al
Plaintiff: Gerald Jones
Defendant: Sand LNU, Tasha Young, Gary L. McFadden and Antonio LNU
Case Number: 3:2020cv00310
Filed: June 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David S Cayer
Referring Judge: Robert J Conrad
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2020 Filing 5 Mail (Order #4 ) addressed to Gerald Jones returned as undeliverable. (ams)
June 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that if Plaintiff fails to amend the complaint within thirty (30) days in accordance with this Order, this action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff. Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order [Doc. 1] is DENIED. Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk is respectfully instructed to combine the documents currently filed separately at Doc. No. 1 and Doc. No. 3 and docket them together as "Plaintiff's Complaint and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order" at Doc. No. 1. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 6/16/2020. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl)
June 17, 2020 Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Complaint due by 7/17/2020. (brl)
June 3, 2020 Filing 3 DOCUMENT DELETED - FILED AS ATTACHMENT TO COMPLAINT PER ORDER #4
June 3, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gerald Jones. (brj)
June 3, 2020 Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order against All Defendants, filed by Gerald Jones. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(brj) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/17/2020: #2 Motion for TRO) (brl). Modified text on 6/17/2020 (brl).
June 3, 2020 Clerk's Entry and Service of #Case Assignment Packet. The document was served conventionally at case filing (brj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. McFadden et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sand LNU
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tasha Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary L. McFadden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antonio LNU
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gerald Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?