Gregory v. Jackson Kayak, Inc et al
| Andrew Gregory |
| Jackson Kayak, Inc and Peter Hausin |
| 3:2020cv00326 |
| June 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| David S Cayer |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Lee K. Royster on behalf of Peter Hausin, Jackson Kayak, Inc (Royster, Lee) |
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #8 Partial MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Partial Motion to Dismiss by Andrew Gregory. Responses due by 8/19/2020 (Bast, Derek). Motions referred to David S. Cayer. |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #8 Partial MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Partial Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 8/17/2020. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 8/5/2020. (DLG)
|
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Jackson Kayak, Inc (McPherson, T.) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Partial Motion to Dismiss by Peter Hausin, Jackson Kayak, Inc. (McPherson, T.) |
| Filing 8 Partial MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Peter Hausin, Jackson Kayak, Inc. Responses due by 8/10/2020 (McPherson, T.) Modified text on 7/28/2020 (brl). |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Andrew Gregory by Peter Hausin, Jackson Kayak, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - TSDR Report, #3 Exhibit B - USPTO Application U.S. Serial No. 88/212,171, #4 Exhibit C - Domain Information on Trailers, #5 Exhibit D - Domain Information on Guided Adventures)(McPherson, T.) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. The deadline for Defendants' answer is extended through Monday, July 27, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 6/25/20. (mga)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Peter Hausin, Jackson Kayak, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McPherson, T.). Motions referred to David S. Cayer. |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Peter Hausin, Jackson Kayak, Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (Attachments: #1 Summons)(brj) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Sean C. Wagner on behalf of Andrew Gregory (Wagner, Sean) |
| Filing 2 REPORT on the Filing of an action regarding patent and/or trademark numbers contained in complaint. (Attachments: #1 Copy of Complaint) (brj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Peter Hausin, Jackson Kayak, Inc with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4526853), filed by Andrew Gregory. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Bast, Derek) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Frank D. Whitney and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brj) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (brj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
