Franklin v. City of Charlotte et al
| Ms. Deborah Franklin and Deborah Franklin |
| Wende Kerl and City of Charlotte |
| 3:2020cv00330 |
| June 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Graham Mullen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ANSWER to #1 Complaint by City of Charlotte.(McCalman, Roger)
|
|
Filing 4
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by City of Charlotte. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McCalman, Roger)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. City of Charlotte answer due 8/6/2020. Entered by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 7/6/2020. (Prichard, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 3
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Deborah Franklin. Wende Kerl waiver sent on 6/16/2020, answer due 8/17/2020. (Largess, S.)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued Electronically as to City of Charlotte, Wende Kerl. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to Wende Kerl)(mek)
|
|
Case assigned to Senior Judge Graham Mullen. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brj)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4529294), filed by Deborah Franklin.(Largess, S.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
