Johnson v. Carmon, et al.
| Adrian M. Johnson |
| FNU Strickland, FNU Pagan, FNU Sherman, FNU Andrews and FNU Carmon |
| 3:2020cv00486 |
| September 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account Statement of Plaintiff. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (hms)
|
| Filing 5 Pro Se AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) by Adrian M. Johnson (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(js) |
| Filing 4 Mail (Documents 1 and 2 and blank IFP application) addressed to Adrian M. Johnson at Maury FCI returned as undeliverable. (js) (Main Document 4 replaced on 10/26/2020) (brl). |
| Filing 3 2ND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint. The filing fee of $400.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Application or Fee due by 10/26/2020. (1st Notice of Deficiency mailed to Adrian M. Johnson with wrong Inmate No. referenced.) (ejb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint. The filing fee of $400.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Application or Fee due by 9/29/2020. (ejb) |
| Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand, filed by Adrian M Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(js) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
