P.S. Greetings, Inc. v. Family Dollar Services, LLC
Plaintiff: P.S. Greetings, Inc. d/b/a Fantus Paper Products and P.S. Greetings, Inc. doing business as Fantus Paper Products
Defendant: Family Dollar Services, LLC
Case Number: 3:2020cv00552
Filed: October 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David S Cayer
Referring Judge: Robert J Conrad
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2020 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Family Dollar Services, LLC (Wright, David)
October 15, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda P. Nitto on behalf of Family Dollar Services, LLC (Nitto, Amanda)
October 15, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David Calep Wright, III on behalf of Family Dollar Services, LLC (Wright, David)
October 15, 2020 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by P.S. Greetings, Inc.. Family Dollar Services, LLC waiver sent on 10/7/2020, answer due 12/7/2020. (Lam, Christopher)
October 5, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Family Dollar Services, LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (js)
October 2, 2020 Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(js)
October 2, 2020 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by P.S. Greetings, Inc. d/b/a Fantus Paper Products (Lam, Christopher)
October 2, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Family Dollar Services, LLC with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4696859), filed by P.S. Greetings, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - April 4, 2011 Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2 - 2013 Amendment, #3 Exhibit 3 - 2018 Amendment, #4 Exhibit 4 - August 2, 2019 Family Dollar email to Fantus, #5 Exhibit 5 - June 6, 2019 M.McCracken email to D.Plummer, #6 Exhibit 6 - June 12, 2019 M.Plummer email to M.McMCracken)(Lam, Christopher) Modified to delete extra wording on 10/5/2020 (js).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: P.S. Greetings, Inc. v. Family Dollar Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: P.S. Greetings, Inc. d/b/a Fantus Paper Products
Represented By: Christopher C. Lam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: P.S. Greetings, Inc. doing business as Fantus Paper Products
Represented By: Christopher C. Lam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Family Dollar Services, LLC
Represented By: Amanda P. Nitto
Represented By: David Calep Wright, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?