Heath v. Saul
Plaintiff: Kimberly Heath
Defendant: Andrew Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 3:2020cv00553
Filed: October 5, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David S Cayer
Referring Judge: Frank D Whitney
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2020 Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Andrew M. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order) (Vainieri, Christian). Motions referred to David S. Cayer.
December 2, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christian Michael Vainieri on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Vainieri, Christian)
December 2, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Andrew M. Saul's answer and electronic certified administrative record due 2/5/2021. This deadline will not be extended again absent case specific information. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 12/2/2020. (DLG)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY Order of Referral - Social Security. Pursuant to the Standing Order 3:13MC95, 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 72.1 this case is referred to a United States Magistrate Judge to make findings of fact, conclusions of law and to recommend disposition of any dispositive motion filed through submission of a Memorandum and Recommendation to the District Judge. Case referred to Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Entered by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/18/20. (clc)
October 5, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Andrew Saul, US Attorney and US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM285 Forms)(eef)
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER (Sealed - Participants) granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/5/2020. (eef)
October 5, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kimberly Heath. (Arrowood, Derrick)
October 5, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Kimberly Heath.(Arrowood, Derrick)
October 5, 2020 Case assigned to District Judge Frank D. Whitney. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(tlj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heath v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Christian Michael Vainieri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Heath
Represented By: Derrick Kyle Arrowood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?