Tobias v. Saul
| Sentaria Harris Tobias |
| Andrew Saul and Andrew M. Saul |
| 3:2020cv00566 |
| October 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USMS as to Andrew M. Saul. US Attorney served on 10/21/2020, answer due 12/21/2020. (js) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USMS as to Andrew M. Saul. US Attorney General served on 10/30/2020. (js) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USMS as to Andrew M. Saul. Social Security Administration served on 10/30/2020. (js) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Andrew Saul, US Attorney and US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 USMS 285)(clc) (Main Document 4 replaced on 10/21/2020) (brl). (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/21/2020) (brl). (Attachment 2 replaced on 10/21/2020) (brl). |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/19/20. (clc)
|
| Case assigned to District Judge Frank D. Whitney. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(js) |
| Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sentaria Harris Tobias. (Griffin, Karen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Sentaria Harris Tobias.(Griffin, Karen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
