Coleman et al v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety et al
| Tangy Coleman and Derrick Coleman |
| Ronald M. Rene, Erik A. Hooks, North Carolina Department of Public Safety, Kenneth E. Lassiter, David Guice, John and Jane Does and W. David Guice |
| 3:2020cv00570 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| David S Cayer |
| Max O Cogburn |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Derrick Coleman, Tangy Coleman. Ronald M. Rene served on 11/23/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. (DeVore, F.)
|
|
Case reassigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. District Judge Frank D. Whitney no longer assigned to the case due to conflict. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(thh)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Ronald M. Rene answer due 1/4/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 12/9/2020. (brl)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Notice of Removal, by Ronald M. Rene. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hall, Jonathan). Motions referred to David S. Cayer.
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan E. Hall on behalf of Ronald M. Rene (Hall, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 5
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by W. David Guice, Erik A. Hooks, Kenneth E. Lassiter, North Carolina Department of Public Safety.(McInnes, Alan)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued Electronically as to Ronald M. Rene. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (tlj)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. W. David Guice, Erik A. Hooks, Kenneth E. Lassiter, North Carolina Department of Public Safety, and Ronald M. Rene answer due 11/20/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 10/28/2020. (brl)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Notice of Removal, by W. David Guice, Erik A. Hooks, Kenneth E. Lassiter, North Carolina Department of Public Safety, Ronald M. Rene. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (McInnes, Alan). Motions referred to David S. Cayer.
|
|
Case reassigned to District Judge Frank D. Whitney and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Chief Judge Martin Reidinger no longer assigned to the case. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(eef)
|
|
Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (eef)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4716563), filed by North Carolina Department of Public Safety, Kenneth E. Lassiter, David Guice, Erik A. Hooks, Ronald M. Rene. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A--Complaint with Exhibits and Discovery, #2 Exhibit B--Summonses Issued, #3 Exhibit C--Affidavit of Service)(McInnes, Alan)
|
|
Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(eef)
|
|
Pro Se Law Clerk Referral to PSLC: 2 (eef)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
