Carlos v. Saul
Africentra Carlos |
Andrew Saul and Andrew M. Saul |
3:2020cv00598 |
October 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Kenneth D Bell |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USMS as to Andrew M. Saul. Social Security Administration served on 11/9/2020. (js) Modified service date on 12/23/2020 (tmg). |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USMS as to Andrew M. Saul. US Attorney General served on 11/09/2020. (js) Modified service date on 12/23/2020 (tmg). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USMS as to Andrew M. Saul. US Attorney served on 11/2/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. (js) Modified service and answer dates on 12/23/2020, NEF Regenerated (tmg). |
Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Andrew M. Saul, US Attorney and US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM 285 Forms) (tmg) |
Filing 3 ORDER (Sealed - Participants) granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk shall issue summons to US Marshal for service. Signed by District Judge Kenneth D. Bell on 10/29/2020. (tmg) |
Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Africentra Carlos. (Arrowood, Derrick) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Africentra Carlos.(Arrowood, Derrick) |
Case assigned to District Judge Kenneth D. Bell. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(js) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.