Male Excel, Inc. et al v. Vergel
Male Excel, Inc. and Craig Larsen |
Nelson Vergel |
3:2020cv00608 |
November 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
David S Cayer |
Robert J Conrad |
Trademark |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 REPORT on the Determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark numbers contained in complaint. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal) (brl) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice by Craig Larsen, Male Excel, Inc. (Sneed, Megan) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Nelson Vergel. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (brl) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan Elizabeth Sneed on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Sneed, Megan) |
Filing 2 REPORT on the Filing of an action regarding patent and/or trademark numbers contained in complaint. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (eef) |
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Nelson Vergel with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4745262), filed by Male Excel, Inc., Craig Larsen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, ANNEX 4 to UDRP Complaint, WHOIS Domain Name Search for |
Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(eef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.