DJ v. Google, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: DJ
Defendant: Vlad TV, Drake and Google, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2020cv00645
Filed: November 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Referring Judge: Frank D Whitney
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2020 Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 12/16/2020. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for Plaintiffs failure to comply with the Courts November 30, 2020 Order. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 12/16/2020. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is directed to pay the filing fee or refile a complete Application within 14 days of this Order. Plaintiff shall file, within 14 days of this Order, a Complaint containing Plaintiffs full name. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/26/20. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
November 30, 2020 Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Complaint & IFP Application due by 12/15/2020 or Filing Fee due by 12/15/2020. (clc)
November 23, 2020 Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The order was served conventionally by U.S. Mail. (eef)
November 23, 2020 Clerk's Entry and Service of #Case Assignment Packet. And #Initial Scheduling Order and Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The document was served conventionally by US Mail (eef)
November 20, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by DJ. (eef)
November 20, 2020 Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against Drake, Google, Inc., Vlad TV, filed by DJ.(eef)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DJ v. Google, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vlad TV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Drake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Google, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?