Lapardi v. Goodman et al
Cynthia Kay Lapardi and Cynthia Kay (Hawkins) Lapardi |
Lyft, Inc. and Nastassia Angelica Goodman |
3:2020cv00679 |
December 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Graham Mullen |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Lyft, Inc.. Replies due by 1/28/2021 (May, Justin) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Lyft, Inc..(May, Justin) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Cynthia Kay (Hawkins) Lapardi. Responses due by 1/21/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit) (Patterson, Brent) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Lyft, Inc. answer due 1/14/2021.. Entered by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on December 14, 2020. (DC) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by Lyft, Inc.. (May, Justin) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin G. May on behalf of Lyft, Inc. (May, Justin) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lyft, Inc. (May, Justin) |
Case assigned to Senior Judge Graham Mullen. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(tlj) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher J Derrenbacher on behalf of Lyft, Inc. (Derrenbacher, Christopher) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0419-4793873), filed by Lyft, Inc..(May, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.