McConnell v. Schaefer Systems International, Inc. et al
Shaquida McConnell |
Elite Resources, Inc. and Schaefer Systems International, Inc. |
3:2020cv00727 |
December 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Robert J Conrad |
David Keesler |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must pay the filing fee within thirty (30) days of this Order or this action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 2/19/2021. (brl) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Fee due by 3/22/2021. (brl) |
Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shaquida McConnell. (Harman, Michael) Modified on 12/28/2020 to correct docket text (tlj). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand, filed by Shaquida McConnell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Right to Sue - Def Elite, #2 Exhibit Notice of Right to Sue - Def Schaefer)(Harman, Michael) Modified on 12/28/2020 to correct docket text (tlj). |
Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(tlj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.