Monroe Bypass Constructors v. NC Department of Transportation
| NC Department of Transportation |
| Monroe Bypass Constructors |
| 3:2020mc00105 |
| July 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Robert J Conrad |
| David Keesler |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Notice of Withdrawal of document by Monroe Bypass Constructors ***Documents terminated: #1 MOTION to Compel Petition to Enforce Arbitration Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 47 receipt number 0419-4571378) filed by Monroe Bypass Constructors. (Moore, Parker) |
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #1 MOTION to Compel Petition to Enforce Arbitration Subpoena. Responses due by 9/4/2020. Replies due by 9/11/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 8/13/20. (mga)
|
| Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #1 MOTION to Compel Petition to Enforce Arbitration Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 47 receipt number 0419-4571378) joint status report and motion to modify briefing schedule by NC Department of Transportation. Responses due by 8/26/2020 (Slusser, Scott). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #11 Motion Joint Status Report and Joint Motion for Modification Order. Respondent shall file a response to "Petition to Enforce Arbitration Subpoena and Summons" (Document No. 1) on or before August 17, 2020; and Petitioner shall file a reply brief on or before August 21, 2020. In the alternative, the parties may file a Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 7/23/20. (mga)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #1 MOTION to Compel Petition to Enforce Arbitration Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 47 receipt number 0419-4571378). Responses due by 8/17/2020 Replies due by 8/21/2020 (mga) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Thomas Slusser on behalf of NC Department of Transportation (Slusser, Scott) |
| Filing 11 Joint MOTION Modification of Order and Status Report by Monroe Bypass Constructors. Responses due by 8/6/2020 (Moore, Parker). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
|
Filing 10
ORDER denying without prejudice #6 Motion for Expedited Hearing on Petition To Enforce Arbitration Subpoena And Summons. Respondent's response to Petitioners #1 Petition due 7/27/2020. Petitioner's reply brief due 8/3/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 7/15/2020. (mek)
|
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by NC Department of Transportation. (Moore, Parker) |
| Set Deadlines as to #1 Petition to Enforce Arbitration Subpoena. Responses due by 7/27/2020 Replies due by 8/3/2020 (mek) |
| NOTICE: Case was filed using the wrong event code. Case has been copied from 3:20-cv-373 to 3:20-mc-105. Please use 3:20-mc-105 for all future pleadings. (eef) |
| Motion referred to David Keesler.: #1 MOTION to Compel Petition to Enforce Arbitration Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 47 receipt number 0419-4571378), #6 Unopposed MOTION to Expedite Hearing (eef) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert L. Burchette on behalf of Monroe Bypass Constructors (Burchette, Robert) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Gary J. Welch on behalf of Monroe Bypass Constructors (Welch, Gary) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION to Expedite Hearing by Monroe Bypass Constructors. Responses due by 7/27/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Stipulation)(Moore, Parker) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Parker Evans Moore on behalf of Monroe Bypass Constructors (Moore, Parker) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Parker Evans Moore on behalf of Monroe Bypass Constructors (Moore, Parker) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monroe Bypass Constructors (Moore, Parker) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support re #1 MOTION to Compel Petition to Enforce Arbitration Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 47 receipt number 0419-4571378) by Monroe Bypass Constructors. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Excerpt from NCDOT Construction Manual)(Moore, Parker) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Compel Petition to Enforce Arbitration Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 47 receipt number 0419-4571378), filed by Monroe Bypass Constructors. Responses due by 7/27/2020 (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit MBC Subpoena Duces Tecum to NCDOT, #3 Exhibit MBC Arbitration Summons to NCDOT, #4 Exhibit Arbitration Panel Order)(Moore, Parker) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Monroe Bypass Constructors v. NC Department of Transportation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NC Department of Transportation | |
| Represented By: | Scott Thomas Slusser |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Monroe Bypass Constructors | |
| Represented By: | Parker Evans Moore |
| Represented By: | Gary J. Welch |
| Represented By: | Robert L. Burchette |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
