Daniel Rufty Legal, PLLC v. Carolina Client Services, LLC
Petitioner: Daniel Rufty Legal, PLLC doing business as Carolina Legal Services
Respondent: Carolina Client Services, LLC
Case Number: 3:2021cv00054
Filed: February 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David S Cayer
Referring Judge: Frank D Whitney
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2021 Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Daniel Rufty Legal, PLLC (Caudill, Bo)
March 2, 2021 TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting in part and denying in part #6 Motion for Hearing. The Court construes the "Motion for Hearing" as requesting oral argument on the petition before the Court. Because of limited courtroom availability, as well as other limitations resulting from the COVID pandemic, the Court DENIES the motion to the extent it requests oral argument. Instead, the Court will hear the parties' respective positions via written submissions to the Court. In addition to the already-filed Petition and Response in Opposition to the Petition, the Court will allow each party to file one additional responsive pleading. Petitioner may file a brief no longer than 4,500 words by March 12, 2021, and Respondent may file a responsive brief no longer than 4,500 words by March 19, 2021. (TM)
February 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Christopher W. Carlson, Jr for Carolina Client Services, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Attorney served via NEF). Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 2/23/21. (mga)
February 23, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Christopher W. Carlson, Jr. Filing fee $ 288, receipt number 0419-4909368. by Carolina Client Services, LLC. (Evans, Jason). Motions referred to David S. Cayer.
February 23, 2021 Notice to Christopher W. Carlson, Jr: Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1 you are required to Register for ECF Account #Application Link. (Attorney served via NEF) Deadline by 3/2/2021. (mga)
February 18, 2021 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Carolina Client Services, LLC (Evans, Jason)
February 17, 2021 Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #1 Complaint, (Verified Petition to Compel Arbitration) by Carolina Client Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(Evans, Jason)
February 17, 2021 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Hearing re #1 Complaint, Verified Petition to Compel Arbitration by Daniel Rufty Legal, PLLC. Responses due by 3/3/2021 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion for Hearing pursuant to Sec. 4 of the FAA) (Caudill, Bo)
February 4, 2021 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Daniel Rufty Legal, PLLC. Carolina Client Services, LLC waiver sent on 2/4/2020, answer due 4/4/2020. (Caudill, Bo)
February 3, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Carolina Client Services, LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (js)
February 3, 2021 Filing 3 Appendix by Daniel Rufty Legal, PLLC, d/b/a Carolina Legal Services. Appendix re: #1 Complaint, Verified Petition to Compel Arbitration (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Service Agreement, undated, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Amendment to Service Agreement, dated August 1, 2019, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Demand in Arbitration and Statement of Claim)(Caudill, Bo)
February 3, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Daniel Rufty Legal, PLLC (Caudill, Bo) Modified to correct extra wording on 2/3/2021 (js).
February 3, 2021 Filing 1 VERIFIED PETITIOIN to Compel Arbitration against Carolina Client Services, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0419-4880538), filed by Daniel Rufty Legal, PLLC,. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Verified Petition to Compel Arbitration)(Caudill, Bo) Modified to correct extra wording and event title on 2/3/2021 (js).
February 3, 2021 Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (js)
February 3, 2021 Case assigned to District Judge Frank D. Whitney and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(js)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniel Rufty Legal, PLLC v. Carolina Client Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Carolina Client Services, LLC
Represented By: Christopher W. Carlson, Jr
Represented By: Jason D. Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel Rufty Legal, PLLC doing business as Carolina Legal Services
Represented By: Matthew Villmer
Represented By: Bo Brandon Caudill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?