Wilkerson v. Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC et al
| William Brandon Wilkerson |
| Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC, Equifax Information Systems, LLC and TransUnion, LLC |
| 3:2021cv00104 |
| March 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| David S Cayer |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint,. Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC answer due 5/25/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 5/4/2021. (mek)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint, by Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Coyle, Marissa). Motions referred to David S. Cayer. |
| Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC (Coyle, Marissa) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Marissa Ann Coyle on behalf of Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC (Coyle, Marissa) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by TransUnion, LLC.(Dunn, Christy) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Affirmative Defenses by Equifax Information Systems, LLC.(Prince-Loyd, Melanie) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. TransUnion, LLC answer due 4/26/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 4/5/2021. (brl)
|
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TransUnion, LLC (Dunn, Christy) |
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint, by TransUnion, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Dunn, Christy). Motions referred to David S. Cayer. |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Christy Cochran Dunn on behalf of TransUnion, LLC (Dunn, Christy) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Cowan deRosset, IV on behalf of TransUnion, LLC (deRosset, Robert) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint,. Equifax Information Systems, LLC answer due 4/26/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 4/2/2021. (mek)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Equifax Information Systems, LLC (Prince-Loyd, Melanie) |
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint, by Equifax Information Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Prince-Loyd, Melanie). Motions referred to David S. Cayer. |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(js) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Frank D. Whitney and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(js) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (js) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Systems, LLC, Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC, TransUnion, LLC with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4935896), filed by William Brandon Wilkerson.(Perry, M.) (Main Document 1 replaced to correct signature date on 3/12/2021) (js). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
