Davis v. Scarborough et al
| Kenneth Davis |
| Rocky Lutz and Shante Scarborough |
| 3:2021cv00132 |
| March 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Prisoner Admin Remedy Statement by Kenneth Davis (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(js) |
Filing 6
ORDER Waiving Initial Partial Filing Fee and Directing Monthly Payments be Made from Prison Account of Kenneth Davis. Directing correctional facility to transmit payments. Signed by the Clerk of Court on 04/21/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (hms)
|
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Sealed - Court) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(js) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account Statement of Plaintiff. Signed by Clerk of Court on 4/7/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (rhf)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS. Signed by Clerk of Court on 4/7/2021 (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (rhf) Modified text on 4/7/2021 (rhf).
|
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) re #1 Complaint by Kenneth Davis (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Financial Statement, #2 Envelope)(eef) |
| Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against Rocky Lutz, Shante Scarborough, filed by Kenneth Davis. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Pro Se Proposed Order, #3 Envelope)(eef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
