Lamprey v. CVS Health Corporation et al
| Diane E Lamprey |
| CVS Health Corporation, North Carolina CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C. and CVS Pharmacy, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00147 |
| April 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| David Keesler |
| Frank D Whitney |
| P.I.: Other |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Joint CERTIFICATION of initial attorney conference and discovery plan (Jackson, Christopher) |
| NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 you are required to conduct an Initial Attorney's Conference within 14 days. At the conference, the parties are required to discuss the issue of consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rules 16.1(A) and 73.1(C). The #Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference, and if applicable, the #Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, should be filed within 5 days of the conference. If appropriate, a party may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference. CIAC Report due by 5/24/2021. (clc) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by CVS Pharmacy, Inc., North Carolina CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C..(Jackson, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant CVS Health Corporation by Diane E Lamprey (Phillips, Randall) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Diane E Lamprey (Phillips, Randall) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Randall Joseph Phillips on behalf of Diane E Lamprey (Phillips, Randall) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting with modification #7 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Notice of Removal/Complaint. Defendants shall file an Answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, on or before May 3, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 4/12/21. (mga)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint by CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., North Carolina CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C.. (Jackson, Christopher). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Leslie C. Packer on behalf of All Defendants (Packer, Leslie) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Ward Jackson on behalf of CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., North Carolina CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C. (Jackson, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by North Carolina CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C. (Jackson, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (Jackson, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CVS Health Corporation (Jackson, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Mecklenburg, case number 21-CVS-3309. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0419-4972272), filed by North Carolina CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C., CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit State Court Summonses, #3 Exhibit State Court Affidavit of Service)(Jackson, Christopher) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (tlj) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Frank D. Whitney and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(tlj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
