Nasta v. Wakefield and Associates, Inc., et al
Plaintiff: Jody Nasta
Defendant: John Does 1-25 and Wakefield and Associates, Inc.,
Case Number: 3:2021cv00276
Filed: June 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David S Cayer
Referring Judge: Frank D Whitney
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Eliyahu Babad for Jody Nasta (Pro Hac Vice Attorney served via NEF). Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 7/12/2021. (mek)
July 12, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Jody Nasta (Emory, C.)
July 12, 2021 Motion referred to David S. Cayer.: #2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Eliyahu Babad Filing fee $ 288, receipt number 0419-5069381. (mek)
July 12, 2021 Notice to Eliyahu Babad: Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1 you are required to (Attorney served via NEF) Deadline by 7/19/2021. (mek)
June 10, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Wakefield and Associates, Inc.,. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (js)
June 10, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Eliyahu Babad Filing fee $ 288, receipt number 0419-5069381. by Jody Nasta. (Emory, C.)
June 10, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Does 1-25, Wakefield and Associates, Inc., with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0419-5069179), filed by Jody Nasta. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Letter, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Emory, C.) Modified on 6/23/2021 to remove duplicative text (rth).
June 10, 2021 Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (js)
June 10, 2021 Case assigned to District Judge Frank D. Whitney and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(js)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nasta v. Wakefield and Associates, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wakefield and Associates, Inc.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jody Nasta
Represented By: C. Randolph Emory
Represented By: Eliyahu Babad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?