Brice v. Marlowe et al
Romeal Brice |
Gaston County Sheriff's Department, FNU Marlowe and Alan Cloninger |
3:2021cv00295 |
June 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Charlotte Office |
Martin Reidinger |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Mail (Document 7) addressed to Romeal Brice returned as undeliverable. (tlj) |
Filing 8 Disregard docket entry, docketed in wrong case. Filing docketed in correct case 1:21-cv-174. Modified on 8/9/2021 (hms). |
Filing 7 ORDER Waiving Initial Partial Filing Fee and Directing Monthly Payments be Made from Prison Account of Romeal Brice. Directing correctional facility to transmit payments. Signed by the Clerk of Court on 8/3/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (hms) |
Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Sealed - Court) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tlj) |
Filing 5 Pro Se Prisoner Admin Remedy Statement by Romeal Brice (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(eef) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account Statement of Plaintiff. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (hms) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS. Signed by the Clerk of Court on 6/24/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(tlj) |
Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) re #1 Complaint by Romeal Brice (tlj) |
Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against Alan Cloninger, Gaston County Sheriff's Department, FNU Marlowe, filed by Romeal Brice. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Envelope)(tlj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.