Duncan v. Isaacs et al
| James Edward Duncan, III |
| Andrew Isaacs, Erick Kelly and Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department |
| 3:2021cv00415 |
| August 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Robert J Conrad |
| David Keesler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department. Responses due by 10/20/2021 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum In support of motion to dismiss) (McCalman, Roger). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 4 Summons Reissued Conventionally as to Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department, Andrew Isaacs, Erick Kelly. (js) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Conventionally as to All Defendants. (tlj) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint. The filing fee of $402.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Application or Fee due by 9/3/2021. (tlj) |
| Filing Fee Received: $ 402.00, receipt number CHD066971 (js) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Case Assignment Packet. The document was served conventionally by US Mail (tlj) |
| Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand, filed by James Edward Duncan, III. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(tlj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
