Dixon v. Dever
| Dalton Alonzo Dixon |
| Honorable Judge James C. Dever, III and James C. Dever, III |
| 3:2021cv00424 |
| August 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Acknowledged receipt of electronically transferred case by USDC Eastern District of North Carolina, their civil action no. 5:21-ct-03244. (rth) |
Filing 4
ORDER on initial review of Plaintiff's #1 Complaint. Plaintiff's action is transferred to the Eastern District of North Carolina. The Clerk is respectfully instructed to terminate this action. Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 8/17/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (hms)
|
| Case electronically transferred to District of Eastern District of North Carolina. Original electronic file and docket sheet sent. (hms) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS. Signed by Clerk of Court, Frank G. Johns on 8/16/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(dgr)
|
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) by Dalton Alonzo Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dgr) |
| Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against James C. Dever, III with Jury Demand, filed by Dalton Alonzo Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(dgr) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(dgr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
