Byers v. Gantt
Plaintiff: Jonathan Byers
Defendant: Sonya Gantt and Sonja Gantt
Case Number: 3:2021cv00431
Filed: August 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Referring Judge: Frank D Whitney
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2021 Filing 9 Mail (Order (Document No. 7)) addressed to Jonathan Byers returned as undeliverable. (Attachments: #1 Order) (kab)
October 6, 2021 Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 10/6/2021. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ef)
October 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER (Sealed - Participants) denying #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiffs failure to comply with the Courts September 14, 2021 Order. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/6/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ef)
September 30, 2021 Filing 6 AMENDED MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jonathan Byers. (js)
September 22, 2021 Filing 5 Mail (Document 4 Order on Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs) addressed to Jonathan Byers returned as undeliverable. (dgr)
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall have 14 days from the date of this order to file an Amended Application. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 9/14/21. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
September 14, 2021 Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended IFP Application due by 9/28/2021. (clc)
September 8, 2021 Filing 3 Mail (Case Assignment Packet and Docket Sheet) addressed to Jonathan Byers returned as undeliverable. (tlj)
August 19, 2021 Clerk's Entry and Service of #Case Assignment Packet. And #Initial Scheduling Order and Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The document was served conventionally by US Mail (tlj)
August 18, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jonathan Byers. (tlj)
August 18, 2021 Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against Sonya Gantt, filed by Jonathan Byers. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(tlj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Byers v. Gantt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Byers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sonya Gantt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sonja Gantt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?