Banyan Licensing L.L.C. v. Marshalls of MA, Inc. d/b/a Marshalls
| Banyan Licensing L.L.C. |
| Marshalls of MA, Inc. d/b/a Marshalls and Marshalls of MA, Inc. doing business as Marshalls |
| 3:2021cv00572 |
| October 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| David S Cayer |
| Robert J Conrad |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Banyan Licensing L.L.C.. Marshalls of MA, Inc. served on 10/26/2021, answer due 11/16/2021. (Wilson, J.) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Marshalls of MA, Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (dgr) |
| Filing 3 REPORT on the Filing of an action regarding patent and/or trademark numbers contained in complaint. (dgr) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(dgr) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Banyan Licensing L.L.C. (Wilson, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Marshalls of MA, Inc. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5284400), filed by Banyan Licensing L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - D312 Patent, #2 Exhibit B - 762 Patent, #3 Exhibit C - Infringing Pillow)(Wilson, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
